The first colonists of America came over to escape religious persecution and had the ability to practice their religious freedoms. Puritans were a group of extremely religious followers of the bible. Their society reflected the bible in their best interpretation, which is often viewed as too harsh. However, religion does serve a purpose. Nearly all laws are based off of the ten commandments, such as, thou shalt not kill, and thou shalt not steal. Other commandments may not be a law, but, it does stand as a moral standard for individuals, at least for now. In The Scarlet Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne and The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, the two authors are critical and contemptuous of the Puritan society and their perhaps overbearing morals; however, is there proof that modern society is any more moral? Morality has descended from the Puritan times to modern day society due to the increasing omission of faith in law and culture.
Morality has shown a plummet since the 17th century Puritans due to the evermore increasing omission of faith in culture. In The Crucible, a reverend tells a man, after he had forgotten one out of ten commandments, that “Theology, sir, is a fortress; no crack in a fortress may be accounted small” (Miller 67). This is a tremendous analogy. Comparing the study of the bible to a ‘fortress’ and then saying that a ‘crack’ is not too small to bring it down is brilliant. Like it or not, the reverend makes an accurate statement. If you forget one commandment, and think it is no big deal, then it becomes easier and easier for you to forget the next one and the next. Take for example a workout routine, there are a set amount of exercises that you must do. Now, say that you forget or are just too lazy to do a certain exercise one day, but, you think nothing of it. The next day it becomes just a little bit easier to forget another one or to not do it. The reverend points out that in order for a continuous success in morality, one must continuously strive for no ‘small cracks’. In comparison to the latter argument, modern society has strayed away from faith and created small cracks to the fortress. A news article in the Washington Times observed that while introducing Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic Nominee, Susan Shin Angulo, a member of the Camden County Board of Freeholders, said “Only Hillary can bring us together as one nation, un- — indivisible, with liberty and justice for all” (Richardson, 2016). Now, take into consideration the audience this woman is addressing. They are going to be democratic, because of the special speaker, and we know that democrats are generally less religious than republicans. Beside the matter, it does not matter the political party, but rather the speaker was trying to appeal to the audience by omitting the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance. This is a crack in the fortress. This omission of faith from everyday activities is dangerous to our morality because it threatens to begin the complete omission of God from all things. Now, just because someone no longer believes in God does not mean that automatically makes them immoral. They are still capable, but they lack a code of law that everyone else follows. Therefore, there is an increasing immorality in culture from the puritans to modern society.
Morality has increasingly fallen from Puritan to modern society because of the omission of faith in laws. In The Scarlet Letter, a random woman says this about Hester when she figures out her punishment, “This woman has brought shame upon us all, and ought to die” (Hawthorne 46). The Puritans believed that because of the seventh commandment, which stated that you shall not commit adultery, there ought to be a punishment for it. The puritans interpretation for punishment was death or the culprit wear an “A” on their chest for the rest of their life. Hawthorne seems to be hinting how preposterous it is for a woman to be punished by execution for adultery; however, do not immediately believe that because Puritans believed in execution they were immoral. Compared to modern society it at least provides a punishment. Granted, death is a far too hefty punishment, but having no punishment is far worse. In a report by Candis McLean, he states, “people are more exposed to licentious behaviour,” and “they become more accepting of it. Increased acceptance of affairs leads to an increased willingness to participate in an affair” (McLean, 2000). McLean understands that because the increasing omission of faith, people are exposed to more and more ‘licentious behavior’. Which then prompts people to commit adultery themselves because it is being accepted; however, that does not mean that it is being embraced. In 16 states adultery is illegal. The punishment ranges from ten dollars in Maryland to 3,000 and up to a year in jail in Minnesota (Oehler 2015). This shows that some states are continuing to follow religious moral codes, but, that still leaves out 34 other states, who deem it acceptable by law to commit adultery. If the law says the latter, then what do the citizens think? It becomes easier and easier for a less moral society. However, even the states that make it illegal are under fire. Global trends have shown that “Adultery bans are a fading but a persistent global phenomenon” (Delman, 2015). Do not be surprised that the remaining states will repeal their bans in the coming years, because the people believe that adultery should be dealt without the law. However, the opposite effect could happen, such as a lessening of immorality because the law does not enforce it.
Morality has decreased since the puritan era to modern society due to the omission of faith in laws and culture. In The Crucible, a reverend talks about how the study of God is a fortress and politicians start to omit words referring to religion to appeal to the population. This will and is leading to an increase of immorality. The same can be said for the omission of faith in law. Adultery was heavily punished by the puritans and in modern society states have laws banning adultery; however, global trends have also lead to repeals of the laws and therefore an increasing of immorality again.
